ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026
Collusion in Cancer Care: An Investigation into its Facets at a Tertiary Care Center in South India.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCollusion, the practice of concealing a diagnosis or prognosis from a close relative to prevent emotional distress, is a complex issue in cancer care. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of collusion among cancer patients and identify the associated factors, including educational status, time since diagnosis, and prognosis.
methodsThis 6-month cross-sectional study recruited 121 consenting cancer patients (aged >18 years) via convenient sampling at a tertiary care center in South India. Patients with psychiatric conditions or communication difficulties were excluded. The data were collected through qualitative interviews using a modified collusion questionnaire.
resultsThe overall prevalence of collusion was 26.4%. Significant associations were found with educational status ( P = 0.024), with collusion being highest among those with primary education (40.7%) and lowest in postgraduates (12.2%). Collusion was also significantly associated with time since diagnosis ( P < 0.001), being 88.9% within 1 month and decreasing to 54.2% by 6 months. Caregivers frequently colluded ( P < 0.001) even when the disease was considered partly curable. Among the collusion positive cases, 96.9% of the caregivers were unwilling to discuss the diagnosis and 87.5% unwilling to inform patients about the disease's course or outcome.
conclusionCollusion is prevalent in cancer patients, particularly among those with lower education levels and in the early postdiagnosis period. Caregivers often withhold comprehensive information, highlighting a need for improved communication strategies in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.