Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40923317›Full record

ReviewJCI insight2025

American Physician Scientist Association annual meetings: celebrating 20 years of physician-scientist training and collaboration.

Cynthia Y Tang, Alex D Waldman, Daniel C Brock

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cynthia Y TangUniversity of North Carolina MD-PhD Program, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Alex D WaldmanAmerican Physician Scientists Association, Westford, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel C BrockDepartment of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Physician Scientists Association (APSA) was founded in 2003 with a mission to build a unified community for physician-scientist trainees. Over the past 2 decades, the APSA has played a pivotal role in fostering the development of future physician-scientists through mentorship, advocacy, and professional development. This year, the APSA hosted its 20th Annual Meeting in Chicago in collaboration with the Association of American Physicians and the American Society for Clinical Investigation. This milestone marks a moment of celebration and reflection, highlighting APSA's enduring impact on the future of physician-scientist training.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPhysiciansResearch PersonnelSocieties, MedicalCongresses as TopicCooperative BehaviorHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMentorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40923317
PMCPMC12487669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.