Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40923211›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025

Variation in Repeated Handgrip Strength Testing Indicates Submaximal Force Production in Patients With Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Stoyan Popkirov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stoyan PopkirovDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational and Behavioral Neurosciences, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-0036

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EO2104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in handgrip strength have recently been adapted as clinical biomarkers for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) under the assumption of a disease-specific peripheral neuromuscular dysfunction. However, some have proposed that strength impairments in ME/CFS are better explained by alterations in higher-order motor control. In serial measurements, exertion can been assessed through analysis of variation, since maximal voluntary contractions exhibit lower coefficients of variation (CV) than submaximal contractions.

methodsSerial handgrip strength measurements of 105 ME/CFS patients and 66 healthy controls from a previously published biomarker validation study are analyzed post hoc regarding their CV. CV is separately compared in a subsample of participant with normal indexes of fatigability.

resultsCompared to healthy controls, patients had significantly higher CV, largely over the conservative 15% cutoff associated with submaximal exertion. In the subsample of study participants, whose within-session fatigability was within normal bounds, CV was still significantly higher in female patients; the difference in male patients was not statistically significant (p = 0.06).

conclusionsThis analysis suggests that loss of grip strength is likely compounded by alterations in higher-order motor control, challenging its utility as a biomarker of peripheral dysfunction. Functional weakness is discussed within a framework that sees motor fatigue as a result of reduced implicit self-efficacy acquired in the context of chronic dyshomoeostasis and disability.

Indexed as

Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicHand StrengthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbiomarkerchronic fatigue syndromehandgripME/CFSstrength

Identifiers

PMID40923211
PMCPMC12417963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.