ReviewBrain and behavior2025
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis:Current Status and Challenges.
Review in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Role of Polyphenols in Platelet Aggregation and Blood Coagulation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Risk factors for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in Xinjiang, China: a single-center case-control study with a focus on high-altitude exposure.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Implementation outcomes of a VTE prevention and management system within the close-knit county medical alliance model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Rare inherited antithrombin deficiency presenting as spontaneous cerebral venous thrombosis with concomitant parenchymal hemorrhage: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis:Current Status and Challenges.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- When headache meets visual disturbance: An evidence-based review of common and critical entities.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a stroke type that primarily affects young individuals, with various risk factors and complex mechanisms. It accounts for 0.5% to 3% of all stroke cases and can significantly impact daily activities and quality of life.
objectiveThis review aims to classify the etiology of CVT, assess its impact on prognosis, and evaluate the best treatment approaches. It also analyzes current issues in CVT management and proposes future directions for treatment.
methodsA comprehensive review of the literature on CVT, focusing on risk factors, treatment strategies, and outcomes. The impact of anticoagulation therapy and endovascular interventions is examined.
resultsThis review examines the various risk factors associated with CVT, including female-specific conditions, infections, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and mechanical triggers. It highlights the impact of these factors on the prognosis and outcomes of CVT. The effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy, both traditional and with direct oral anticoagulants, is discussed, along with the role of endovascular therapy in severe cases. The review also identifies current challenges in CVT management, such as incomplete thrombus clearance and the lack of standardized evaluation criteria for recanalization.
conclusionFurther research is needed to optimize CVT management, improve patient outcomes, and enhance the quality of life for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.