ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
An Evaluation of Mental Health First Aid Officer Utilisation Across an International, Interdisciplinary Oncology Group.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMental health is a critical component of overall well-being, yet healthcare professionals, particularly those in oncology, face unique stressors that increase their risk of compassion fatigue and burnout. Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training equips non-mental health professionals with the skills to support individuals experiencing distress. Our international oncology organisation implemented MHFA training to foster mentally healthy workplaces. This study evaluated the utilisation of these MHFA officers (MHFAOs) over a 12-month period.
methodsAn anonymous online survey was conducted in July 2024, inviting 34 trained MHFAOs across 13 professional disciplines. The survey collected quantitative and qualitative data on MHFA training, utilisation and perceptions.
resultsA total of 21 survey responses (62%) were included for analysis. While most respondents had engaged in MHFA interactions, six reported no interactions in the past year. The majority of MHFAO reported the combined interactions totalled between 3 and 5 h, with some exceeding 10 h total in the past 12 months. While most respondents reported manageable MHFA workloads, key challenges identified in the qualitative data include a potential lack of awareness of the MHFA programme, unclear role definitions and responsibilities, and limited resources.
conclusionsUtilisation of MHFA across Icon's international, interdisciplinary oncology service in Australia and New Zealand has been demonstrated. While most respondents reported manageable MHFA workloads, it was identified that challenges exist in programme awareness, role clarity, and resource allocation. Addressing these concerns through improved guidelines, ongoing training, and increased visibility of MHFAOs could enhance the programme's effectiveness and long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.