ArticleJTCVS open2025
Primary repair of common arterial trunk: A systematic meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Primary repair of the common arterial trunk is still burdened by high mortality rates. Because of the low incidence and complexity of common arterial trunk, evidence is limited to reports with small sample sizes, and issues such as the ideal surgical timing to address the primary repair are still debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled mortality, morbidity, and reoperation rates after common arterial trunk primary repair. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid-MEDLINE, and Ovid-EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies on common arterial trunk primary repair. Eligible studies reporting early mortality (primary outcome) after common arterial trunk primary repair were screened. Secondary outcomes were survival and reoperation on the right ventricle pulmonary artery conduit at the follow-up. Results: Among 319 articles retrieved, 43 studies including 4844 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled early mortality was 11.23% (95% CI, 9.4-13.37). There was no difference in the early mortality rates between multicenter and single-center studies. The sub-analysis comparing the neonatal and non-neonatal repair groups showed a significantly lower mortality rate in the neonatal group ( Conclusions: The early mortality rate after common arterial trunk primary repair is relatively high, and the reoperation rate per year on the right ventricle pulmonary artery conduit is a major problem. This meta-analysis supports the current tendency of performing primary repair during the neonatal period and can serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.