ArticleJTCVS open2025
Impact of mitral valve interventions on left ventricular hemodynamics: Insights into energy loss and flow dynamics.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Leaflet Materials, Stent Materials, and Stent Cell Density for Bileaflet Transcatheter Mitral Valve Design.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement: Hemodynamics in Valve Surgery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Ophthalmic Artery Morphology and Hemodynamics in Ocular Ischemic Syndrome: A Computational Fluid Dynamics and Particle Image Velocimetry Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Left ventricular vortex dynamics play a crucial role in cardiac function but are significantly altered by mitral valve diseases or surgical interventions. Such hemodynamic changes may lead to maladaptive intracardiac vortices, potentially triggering pathways associated with progressive left ventricular remodeling and thrombosis. This study assessed left ventricular hemodynamics under both physiological and pathological conditions using a biohybrid in vitro platform, aiming to analyze the impact of these conditions on cardiac function. Methods: An in vitro platform was established to simulate 6 mitral valve conditions: healthy, mitral regurgitation, bioprosthetic valve replacement, mechanical valve replacement (in 2 orientations), and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair. Flow fields within the left ventricle were captured using 4-dimensional particle image velocimetry, including mean flow fields, vortex depth, vortex transversal position, viscous shear stress, and energy dissipation. Results: Mitral regurgitation preserved vortex structure compared with healthy conditions. Mechanical valves altered vortex direction and reduced vortex transversal position (0.66-0.47, Conclusions: Preserving native valve function optimizes left ventricular hemodynamics, whereas valve replacements and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair alter flow patterns, increasing cardiac workload and thrombotic risks. These findings underscore the importance of assessing left ventricular flow dynamics in the treatment of mitral regurgitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.