ArticleJTCVS open2025
An alternative approach to repair of giant paraesophageal hernia in selected patients with minimal history of reflux: Analysis of outcomes in more than 100 patients.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (LGPEHR) is a complex operation and typically includes an antireflux procedure (ARS); however, some patients without a history of reflux may be able to avoid an ARS. The objective of this study was to evaluate an alternative approach for giant paraesophageal hernia (GPEH) repair with restoration of the normal anatomy and an extended gastropexy in selected patients with minimal reflux symptoms. Methods: Patients who underwent GPEH repair with an extended gastropexy were reviewed retrospectively. The procedure was not a "simple gastropexy." The LGPEHR included complete mediastinal dissection, hernia-sac reduction that restored anatomic intra-abdominal positioning of the stomach with careful preservation of the crura and vagal nerves, and tension-free crural repair. Then, an extended gastropexy was performed by placing a series of horizontal mattress sutures along the line of the short gastric vessels to the left crus and diaphragm. Perioperative outcomes, symptomatic improvement, recurrence, need for reoperation, and quality of life (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire) were evaluated. Results: A total of 114 patients (median age 77.4 years) underwent GPEH repair with gastropexy (elective n = 81; urgent/emergent n = 33). Perioperative complications occurred in 11 patients (9.6%). Dysphagia improved significantly ( Conclusions: LGPEHR with restoration of the normal anatomy and an extended gastropexy appears to be safe with good outcomes when key elements of repair are incorporated. If further validated, this option may be considered in selected high-risk patients who are not candidates for an ARS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.