Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40923040›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2025

Midwives' Perceptions of Promoting Pregnancy Vaccines in Wales: Identifying Factors Influencing Vaccine Uptake Using the COM-B Framework.

Kate Lloyd, Sara Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate LloydSwansea University Swansea UK.
Sara JonesSwansea University Swansea UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-6314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccinations are vital for global health; however, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, there has been a notable decline in maternal vaccine acceptance in Wales, UK. It is a key part of a midwife's role to promote vaccine uptake in pregnancy. Therefore, gaining an understanding of midwives' perceptions of the issue is crucial for identifying factors influencing vaccine uptake in Wales. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted amongst 143 registered midwives working in Wales using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) approach to identify factors affecting vaccine uptake. Results: Midwives lacked training and confidence to promote vaccines, and some noted language barriers as a problem to providing equitable care. Other problems included lack of access to vaccination appointments and inconsistencies in vaccine promotion depending on care provider. Midwives perceived vaccine hesitancy to be high, with 71% saying they thought vaccine hesitancy was common amongst pregnant women and 40% saying they thought it was common amongst their colleagues. Conclusion: A national approach is required to ensure effective vaccination training amongst midwives in Wales, as well as improved availability of language diverse resources. Additional qualitative research is needed in Wales and the United Kingdom to further understand vaccine hesitancy and barriers to promoting vaccine uptake in pregnancy.

Indexed as

capabilitymidwivesmotivation‐behaviour (COM‐B)opportunityperceptionspregnancyvaccinationWales

Identifiers

PMID40923040
PMCPMC12414444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.