ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Understanding the rural injury providers' experiences with trauma clinical guidance: a qualitative case series.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Better way: initial acceptability testing of using artificial intelligence tools to accelerate development of trauma clinical guidance.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- TheTrauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Trauma is the leading cause of death among individuals aged 1-44 years, and it is estimated that many of these deaths could be prevented. Clinical guidance is an essential step toward the optimization of trauma care, especially within rural environments. This qualitative case series seeks to better understand how trauma clinical guidance (TCG) plays a role in rural trauma providers' patient management. Methods: An initial exploratory qualitative case series consisting of five semi-structured interviews with rural providers recruited using snowball sampling from existing professional networks were conducted between February and April 2024. Providers were asked to provide details on how they approach clinical uncertainty and if clinical guidance plays a role in their decision making. Then, providers performed real-time reviews of clinical guidance documents, identifying areas for clinical guidance improvement. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and data analyzed using narrative and thematic approaches, with key themes identified through peer debriefing with relevant quotes selected. Results: Of the five providers interviewed, three provide care at a critical access hospital, one provides care at a level II trauma center, and one at a level III trauma center. Two interviewees mentioned that they do not use clinical guidance often in direct patient care, and three highlighted the use of advanced trauma life support as the foundation of their practice on which they expand their tools and training. Common requests of TCG from rural providers included: (1) visual components to guide workflow, (2) easy discoverability in a central place, (3) relevant across various resource settings, (4) a centralized 'stamp of approval,' for guidelines that have been mutually agreed on via extensive collaboration, and (5) transfer guidance. Conclusion: The needs of rural trauma providers should be a focal point when working to improve the creation and dissemination of TCG. Collaboration when creating new TCG is essential. By intentionally designing for the rural population, we will increase the reach and impact of the guidance developed, as well as improve its accessibility and usability for all providers, regardless of resource setting. Through these efforts, we will decrease the disparate burden of trauma and unintentional injury on rural patients and their healthcare providers. Level of evidence: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.