Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40923023›Full record

ArticleCancer pathogenesis and therapy2025

Whole transcriptome analysis identifies

Deeksha Rikhari, Ankit Srivastava, Sandhya Rai, Mubashra, Srinivas Patnaik, Sameer Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deeksha RikhariDepartment of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India.
Ankit SrivastavaDepartment of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India.
Sandhya RaiDepartment of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India.
MubashraDepartment of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India.
Srinivas PatnaikSchool of Biotechnology, KIIT-Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Sameer SrivastavaDepartment of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad 211004, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex, heterogeneous disease characterized by frequent relapses and metastasis. Previous studies have reported that the invasion and progression of CRC in several cases can be controlled by targeting fusion genes. This study aimed to screen for potent fusion transcripts as potential molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets for metastatic CRC (mCRC) using an Methods: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from 18 patients with primary CRC and matched normal and mCRC samples were derived from the same patient set. Novel fusion transcripts were screened using the Kallisto and Pizzly software, followed by Gene Ontology (GO), pathway analysis, transcription factor enrichment, and survival for functional enrichment analysis. Furthermore, the fusion transcripts' utility as biomarkers was evaluated using a pan-cancer analysis. Results: In total, 32 fusion genes unique to mCRC were identified. Hub gene analysis identified 17 novel fusion transcripts, and GO analysis revealed that these genes were enriched in different biological and molecular functions. Pathways significantly correlated with CRC included the complement and coagulation cascades, ferroptosis, interleukin-17 ( Conclusions:

Indexed as

ALB-EEF1A1BiomarkerColorectal cancerDiagnosticFunctional enrichmentFusion transcriptPan-cancerRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40923023
PMCPMC12414284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.