ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Stomach: Diagnostic Pitfalls and Clinical Implications.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSolitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm that most commonly originates in the pleura but can also occur at extrapleural sites, including the abdominal cavity. Among these, primary SFT of the stomach is exceptionally rare. Due to overlapping clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic characteristics, distinguishing SFT from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) can be particularly challenging. Misdiagnosis may result in inappropriate treatment, such as unnecessary administration of imatinib. Therefore, accurate preoperative differentiation is essential for appropriate management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old man was incidentally found to have a submucosal gastric tumor during a routine health checkup and was referred to our hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a 30-mm subepithelial lesion on the greater curvature of the gastric fundus. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) demonstrated isolated and clustered cells with ovoid to spindle-shaped nuclei. Although not definitive, the combined endoscopic and cytological findings led to a preoperative diagnosis of suspected GIST, and laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery (LECS) was subsequently performed for local resection. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed an irregular proliferation of spindle cells and nuclear immunopositivity for signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), leading to a final diagnosis of SFT of the stomach. According to Demicco's risk stratification model, the tumor was classified as low risk. The patient underwent complete resection via LECS and has remained free of recurrence for more than 2.5 years postoperatively.
conclusionsThis case highlights the difficulty in differentiating SFT from GIST preoperatively and underscores the importance of obtaining sufficient tissue samples to allow for immunohistochemical analysis, particularly STAT6 staining. Recognizing gastric SFT as part of the differential diagnosis is critical to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.