ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2026
Who Obtains Informed Consent for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke? A Survey of Clinicians.
Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Informed consent (IC) practices for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute stroke are not well elucidated. We investigated the roles and specialties of those obtaining EVT IC, aiming to provide insights for enhancing the process. Methods: We conducted a survey from July- December 2023 among acute stroke care clinicians. Utilizing Qualtrics, we disseminated a questionnaire through various national and international online platforms. This analysis summarizes the characteristics of individuals who obtain IC at respondents' institution. Results: Among 168 respondents, 71% were staff physicians, 70% practiced in the US and 70% worked at academic centers. Neurology (77%) was the most common specialty obtaining EVT IC, followed by neurosurgery (41%), radiology (30%) and emergency medicine (EM) (10%). Staff physicians were the most frequently involved (61%), followed by fellows (43%), residents (48%) and advanced practice providers (APPs) (36%). Comparatvely, non-US institutions were more likely to utilize neurologists alone (50% vs 31%, Conclusion: Neurologists and staff physicians are the primary providers obtaining EVT IC, with variations based on region and institution type. Future efforts to optimize the IC process should integrate various specialties and be widely adaptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.