Free and encapsulated stem cells for skin regeneration.

Kimia Esmaeilzadeh, Sina Farzi Molan, Farshid Sefat, Samad Nadri

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimia EsmaeilzadehDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 516661-4733, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-7710

Sina Farzi MolanDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

Farshid SefatDepartment of Biomedical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Samad NadriDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-3152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal skin healing is a sophisticated, coordinated process involving cellular and molecular interactions. Disruptions in this process can result in chronic wounds, necessitating medical intervention, particularly when the damage surpasses the body's regenerative capabilities. In response, novel therapies, especially tissue engineering and stem cell treatments, have been devised to restore tissue architecture and maximum functionality. Stem cells, which can differentiate into diverse cell types and regulate immune responses, hold significant potential for wound healing. Research demonstrates that integrating stem cells with scaffolds expedites this process, with numerous therapies advancing from laboratory studies to clinical trials. This review examines fundamental principles, classifications of stem cells, mechanisms, therapeutic applications, and challenges associated with stem cell encapsulation in wound healing.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsScaffoldStem cell therapyTissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID40922954

DOI10.34172/bi.30806

PMCPMC12413985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.