ArticleBMJ public health2025
Retrospective population-based study of 132 000 Canadians on the relationship between community belonging and diabetes incidence.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Community belonging is a dimension of subjective well-being that is of growing public health interest for mitigating chronic disease. However, there is limited longitudinal evidence that such a relationship exists. We assessed the effect of community belonging on the subsequent 5-year risk of diabetes. Research design and methods: This population-based cohort study consisted of 132 295 Ontario respondents of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2000-2014) aged 30-75 years and diabetes-free. Individuals were linked to a validated diabetes registry and followed for 5 years or until 31 March 2020. Survey respondents rated their sense of belonging to community on a 4-point scale (very strong, somewhat strong, somewhat weak or very weak belonging). We estimated the effect of community belonging on 5-year diabetes incidence using Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for sociodemographic and behavioural confounders. Analyses were also stratified, weighted and modelled by key individual-level characteristics. Results: At survey response, 9.5% of the sample reported having very weak sense of belonging to their communities. By the end of study follow-up, 5.3% of the sample developed diabetes. IPT weighting achieved balance between community belonging groups across the sample and subgroups. Respondents with a very weak sense of belonging exhibited higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.46, compared with those with somewhat weak, somewhat strong and very strong sense of belonging), even after accounting for individual-level factors via IPTW (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.34). Those with very weak belonging exhibited elevated risk of diabetes across most subgroups, and this association remained conclusive after IPT weighting for Canadian-born and white participants. Conclusions: The association between weak sense of belonging to community and diabetes risk demonstrated by this study highlights the critical role that social connections play in chronic disease epidemiology. Our findings signal a need to include social and community factors in population health strategies for chronic disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.