Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922924›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Analysis of hospital costs for robotic and open pancreatectomy incurred during the implementation of a robotic pancreatectomy program at a cancer center.

Heather G Lyu, Yuki Hirata, Pamela W Lu, Jess E Maxwell, Rebecca A Snyder, Michael P Kim, Hop Tran Cao, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Matthew H G Katz, Naruhiko Ikoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heather G LyuDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7759-0799
Yuki HirataDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-6392
Pamela W LuDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Jess E MaxwellDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Rebecca A SnyderDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Michael P KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Hop Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Naruhiko IkomaDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy compared to those of open pancreatectomy are assumed to be high but are not well known, particularly during the initial implementation of the robot. Study Design: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for any diagnosis from January 2017 to August 2021 were identified retrospectively. Total hospital cost was calculated using intraoperative, inpatient, and outpatient costs within 30 days of surgery. The ratio of the total cost of each pancreatectomy to the average cost of all operations at our center was used to represent cost without sharing proprietary financial data. Propensity score matching was performed to account for significant differences between the two groups. Results: We identified 679 patients who underwent pancreatectomies, 88 of which were robotic. After propensity score matching, the open cohort had 176 patients, and the robotic cohort remained at 88 patients. The median hospital length of stay was 2 days shorter for robotic than for open pancreatectomy ( Conclusion: Overall, total hospital costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy were lower than those for open surgery, mainly driven by shorter length of stay. Our findings suggest that costs of robotic pancreatectomy may decrease further with increased surgeon experience.

Indexed as

cost analysishepatobiliaryminimally invasive surgerypancreatectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40922924
PMCPMC12414595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.