ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Reoperative pouch surgery for suspected Crohn's-related complications aided by biologic coverage: Early experience from an inflammatory bowel disease center.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transabdominal Surgical Management for Pouch Failure.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Reoperative pouch surgery for suspected Crohn's-related complications aided by biologic coverage: Early experience from an inflammatory bowel disease center.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: In patients with failing ileo-anal pouches there is often diagnostic uncertainty. In this setting, we may offer revisional pouch surgery with biologic "coverage" for presumed Crohn's disease (CD) which enables an alternative to pouch excision and end ileostomy to highly motivated patients. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent revisional/redo ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for failing pouches with biologic coverage for possible CD. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study based on data from a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center. Patients who underwent revisional/redo IPAA surgery between September 2016 and December 2022 were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of functioning pouch. Results: Of the 213 patients who underwent revisional/redo IPAA surgery, 17 underwent redo IPAA surgery with biologic coverage due to concern for CD. An additional seven patients were started on biologics between the two operative stages of redo IPAA surgery. At a median follow-up of 17 months, the functioning pouch rate was 75%. Conclusions: Revisional IPAA surgery for suspected CD-related complications leading to pouch failure, in conjunction with concurrent medical therapy, provides a stoma-free alternative to patients otherwise facing pouch excision and end ileostomy. Despite the limited number of patients and varying follow-up times, this approach shows promise for maintaining pouch function in a challenging patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.