Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922915›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Current status, trends, and controversies in the selection of gastrectomy procedures: Insights from two nationwide questionnaire surveys conducted over a 7-year interval in Japan.

Koji Nakada, Hideyuki Kashiwagi, Shinichi Kinami, Hiroharu Yamashita, Nobuyoshi Hanyu, Atsushi Oshio, Michio Kaminishi, Yasuyuki Seto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koji NakadaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4472-1008
Hideyuki KashiwagiDepartment of Surgery Fuji City General Hospital Shizuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5346-0816
Shinichi KinamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology Kanazawa Medical University Ishikawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-3120
Hiroharu YamashitaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9468-3716
Nobuyoshi HanyuDepartment of Surgery Tokyo General Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7467-1070
Atsushi OshioFaculty of Letters, Arts and Sciences Waseda University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-2916
Michio KaminishiDirector of Hospital Showa General Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study explores the evolving landscape of gastrectomy procedures in Japan, based on nationwide surveys conducted in 2014 and 2021. It highlights changes in surgical approaches, including a growing focus on minimally invasive and function-preserving procedures, as well as the increasing consideration of postoperative quality of life (QOL). Methods: Two nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2014 and 2021, targeting members of the Japanese Society for Gastro-surgical Pathophysiology. The surveys covered institutional characteristics, surgical case volumes, procedure preferences for early gastric cancer by tumor location, and emerging topics such as robot-assisted surgery and sentinel node navigation surgery. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and residual analysis for changes in procedure selection over time. Results: The results indicate a marked shift toward laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy, alongside a rise in function-preserving procedures, particularly proximal gastrectomy and small remnant distal gastrectomy. However, procedures like pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and vagus nerve preservation, and total gastrectomy with jejunal pouch reconstruction remain underutilized due to concerns regarding unclear benefits, technical complexity, and oncological safety. Conclusion: This study underscores advancements in minimally invasive and function-preserving gastrectomy procedures in Japan but emphasizes the need for more robust clinical evidence to support the broader adoption of certain procedures. Future research, guided by emerging evaluation tools, is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and enhancing QOL for gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

gastric cancerquestionnaire surveyreconstruction methodsurgical procedurestype of gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID40922915
PMCPMC12414593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.