ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Current status, trends, and controversies in the selection of gastrectomy procedures: Insights from two nationwide questionnaire surveys conducted over a 7-year interval in Japan.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Total and Distal Gastrectomy After Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Observational Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Differences in patient-reported symptoms following radical gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Current status, trends, and controversies in the selection of gastrectomy procedures: Insights from two nationwide questionnaire surveys conducted over a 7-year interval in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Effects of anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I method on remnant stomach motor functions and postoperative quality of life.Journal of smooth muscle research = Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai kikanshi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study explores the evolving landscape of gastrectomy procedures in Japan, based on nationwide surveys conducted in 2014 and 2021. It highlights changes in surgical approaches, including a growing focus on minimally invasive and function-preserving procedures, as well as the increasing consideration of postoperative quality of life (QOL). Methods: Two nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2014 and 2021, targeting members of the Japanese Society for Gastro-surgical Pathophysiology. The surveys covered institutional characteristics, surgical case volumes, procedure preferences for early gastric cancer by tumor location, and emerging topics such as robot-assisted surgery and sentinel node navigation surgery. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and residual analysis for changes in procedure selection over time. Results: The results indicate a marked shift toward laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy, alongside a rise in function-preserving procedures, particularly proximal gastrectomy and small remnant distal gastrectomy. However, procedures like pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and vagus nerve preservation, and total gastrectomy with jejunal pouch reconstruction remain underutilized due to concerns regarding unclear benefits, technical complexity, and oncological safety. Conclusion: This study underscores advancements in minimally invasive and function-preserving gastrectomy procedures in Japan but emphasizes the need for more robust clinical evidence to support the broader adoption of certain procedures. Future research, guided by emerging evaluation tools, is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and enhancing QOL for gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.