ArticleCureus2025
Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care: A Retrospective Descriptive Assessment of Facility-Based Births in Rural Public Health Facilities in Midwestern Uganda.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Efforts to reduce maternal and newborn deaths, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, have not been sufficient to achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 for 2030. The quality of care around childbirth is critical for both mothers and newborns, and the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is vital in ensuring optimal outcomes. However, there is a paucity of recent research on the use of evidence-based practices in childbirth health facilities. Aims This study aimed to describe the use of intrapartum evidence-based practices for facility-based births in rural lower public health facilities in Midwestern Uganda. Methods A descriptive retrospective chart review was conducted of mothers who delivered at all public health facilities in the Kasese and Bundibugyo districts. Mothers who had given birth in 42 health facilities two months preceding the study period were systematically sampled using probability proportionate to the size of expected respective facility births. Data was collected between November and December 2024. A structured questionnaire adopted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) was used to extract data on the use of EBPs. A descriptive analysis was done, and the results were presented as frequencies and percentages. Results Of the 353 mothers, 73.1% (n=258) were monitored using a partograph. Blood pressure (BP) was the least monitored at only 23.6% (n=83). At admission, apart from Leopold's examination, which was performed and recorded in 86.7% (n=306) of the charts, all other practices were below 50%. About 32.3% (n=114) of the charts had a documented management plan, and all expected laboratory investigations were in less than 2% of the charts. The record of the examination of newborns prior to discharge was low, at 15.6% (n=55). The coverage of EBPs was lowest in hospitals and highest in facilities at the health center 3 (HCIII) level. Conclusions The findings indicate a need for strategies and research to improve the implementation of evidence-based practices in rural public health facilities, especially in hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.