ReviewCureus2025
Community Nursing Interventions and Their Impact on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review of International Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Community Nurses Modify Relational, Social, and Institutional Environments to Enable Participation in a Rural Japanese Village: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reconstructing Social Participation in Rural Communities: A Qualitative Study of Community Nursing Practice.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Correlates of Purpose in Life and Their Potential Role in Successful Aging Among Older Adults in Rural Japan.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review synthesized findings from 17 studies conducted between 2000 and 2024, focusing on the definitions, interventions, and outcomes associated with community nursing. The studies originated from diverse countries, including Singapore, Australia, Italy, Portugal, and the United States, and employed various designs such as quasi-experimental trials, pre-post evaluations, and descriptive studies. Sample sizes ranged from 23 to over 1,600 participants, with most targeting older adults or individuals with chronic conditions. Definitions of community nursing varied, reflecting differences in national healthcare systems. Still, common features included nurse-led services focused on prevention, self-management support, and care coordination in non-hospital settings. Interventions ranged from short-term health fairs to long-term, structured programs, often including health assessments, lifestyle coaching, medication adherence support, and caregiver education. Outcomes were grouped into four categories: healthcare service utilization, patient-reported outcomes, clinical indicators, and quality of life. Notably, one large-scale program in Singapore reported a 23% reduction in emergency department visits. Other studies documented increases in self-monitoring behavior, improved self-efficacy, and greater patient satisfaction. However, limitations included small sample sizes, non-randomized designs, and reliance on self-reported data. Despite these constraints, the review highlights the potential of community nursing to improve individual health outcomes and reduce healthcare system burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.