Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922836›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Full-Endoscopic Spinal Canal Decompression After Direct Midline Splitting of the Spinous Process: A Technical Note.

Eitaro Okumura, Tatsuya Maegawa, Yosuke Nakayama, Hitoshi Hayase, Motoo Kubota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eitaro OkumuraSpinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Tatsuya MaegawaSpinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Yosuke NakayamaSpinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Hitoshi HayaseSpinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
Motoo KubotaSpinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For lumbar spinal canal stenosis, endoscopic spine surgery typically employs a unilateral approach. While this approach has the advantage of early access to the lamina, it risks damage to the facet joint on the entry side. Additionally, decompression of the ipsilateral lateral recess can be challenging, sometimes resulting in inadequate decompression laterally, leading to incomplete symptom relief. To address these issues, a midline approach after midline splitting of the spinous process has been developed. However, this technique often uses a relatively large 16mm cylindrical retractor, resulting in skin incisions of approximately 20-25mm according to various reports. In our case, we performed a full-endoscopic spinal canal decompression underwater using a 7mm diameter through a 12mm skin incision, after directly splitting the spinous process along the midline. This technique achieved sufficient decompression with favorable outcomes. We report the details of this less invasive surgical procedure. The patient was a 62-year-old male who was independent in activities of daily living with a history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. This patient underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis eight years ago. He had experienced pain in the left groin and perineal area (Numerical Rating Scale 6) for five months without improvement, which led him to our outpatient clinic. At the time of his visit, there was no apparent muscle weakness in either lower limb, only sensory disturbance. Lumbar MRI examination led to a diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (L1/2) and conus medullaris syndrome. He requested endoscopic treatment, and we decided to perform an underwater full-endoscopic spinal canal decompression. The surgery involved a 12mm midline skin incision and direct splitting of the spinous process (L1) by approximately 10mm using a chisel and hammer. After placing a straight sheath, trumpet-shaped laminectomy was performed under endoscopic visualization. Trumpet-shaped refers to a laminectomy technique where the surgical field gradually widens as bone removal progresses deeper into the lamina. The yellow ligaments on both sides were removed as much as possible, resulting in sufficient decompression. Both facet joints were preserved, and extensive decompression was achieved. Postoperatively, although the patient still had some perineal pressure sensation, the sensory disturbance in the groin area improved, and he was discharged home on the second postoperative day with a modified Rankin Scale of 1. We report a case of successful spinal canal decompression using an endoscopic approach after midline splitting of the spinous process for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. We consider this surgical method to be valuable as it is less invasive, provides a good symmetrical view, and allows sufficient decompression on both sides.

Indexed as

decompression laminectomyfull-endoscopic spine surgerylumbar spinal canal stenosismidline splitting of spinous processminimally invasive surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID40922836
PMCPMC12414615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.