Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922825›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Advancements in Facial Reconstruction Surgery: The Role of Bioengineered Materials, Artificial Intelligence, and 3D Printing in Addressing Economic Disparities.

Khushi A Murnal, Daniel S Knupflemacher, Paola A Chavez, Vishwas Karanth, Aura C Luzardo, Rafael Giner, Erika Aguirre, Maitri Patel, Ramsha Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Khushi A MurnalMedicine, Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences, Belgaum, IND.
Daniel S KnupflemacherMedicine, Westhill University, Mexico City, MEX.
Paola A ChavezPlastic Surgery, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, PER.
Vishwas KaranthMedicine, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga, IND.
Aura C LuzardoSurgery, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ARG.
Rafael GinerSurgery, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, VEN.
Erika AguirreMedicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, MEX.
Maitri PatelMedicine, The College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, USA.
Ramsha AliMedicine and Surgery, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences, Nawabshah, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of science and technology is an undeniable phenomenon that is progressively transforming all aspects of human life, including scientific, social, humanitarian, and environmental fields, among others. Facial reconstruction surgery has recently gained much attention owing to the incorporation of new technologies, such as bioprinting, regenerative medicine (RM), and artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery. These advancements have led to more innovative, site-specific, and optimal methods of addressing the challenges of facial reconstruction following trauma, congenital malformations, and oncological resections. However, this progress is not available in many underprivileged parts of the world, and it is significantly limited to certain populations with high economic resources. This review is designed to offer a thorough evaluation of the state of the art in facial reconstruction surgery, with regard to the deployment of bioengineered materials, AI-based surgical planning, and three-dimensional (3D) printing. It also analyzes how the most advanced techniques in facial reconstructive surgery are being implemented for the benefit of the population and how this implementation is affected by the economic disparities of each society. Facial reconstruction surgery is rapidly changing, and technology is playing a key role in this change. Nevertheless, innovation alone is not enough. For this, the effectiveness of innovation has to be combined with the best practices of implementation, which requires a multidisciplinary effort between clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, to ensure the safety, accessibility, and ethical integrity of advancements. The success of facial reconstruction surgery cannot be attributed to technological sophistication alone, but also to the frequency of improvement in the quality of life.

Indexed as

3d imagingacellular dermal matrixcraniofacial surgerydecellularization-recellularizationfacial plastic reconstructive surgeriesflap techniquesplastic surgeryradiofrequencyregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40922825
PMCPMC12414503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.