ReviewCureus2025
Advancements in Facial Reconstruction Surgery: The Role of Bioengineered Materials, Artificial Intelligence, and 3D Printing in Addressing Economic Disparities.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Repair and reconstruction of facial organ injuries: a perfect fit of structure and function].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement of science and technology is an undeniable phenomenon that is progressively transforming all aspects of human life, including scientific, social, humanitarian, and environmental fields, among others. Facial reconstruction surgery has recently gained much attention owing to the incorporation of new technologies, such as bioprinting, regenerative medicine (RM), and artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery. These advancements have led to more innovative, site-specific, and optimal methods of addressing the challenges of facial reconstruction following trauma, congenital malformations, and oncological resections. However, this progress is not available in many underprivileged parts of the world, and it is significantly limited to certain populations with high economic resources. This review is designed to offer a thorough evaluation of the state of the art in facial reconstruction surgery, with regard to the deployment of bioengineered materials, AI-based surgical planning, and three-dimensional (3D) printing. It also analyzes how the most advanced techniques in facial reconstructive surgery are being implemented for the benefit of the population and how this implementation is affected by the economic disparities of each society. Facial reconstruction surgery is rapidly changing, and technology is playing a key role in this change. Nevertheless, innovation alone is not enough. For this, the effectiveness of innovation has to be combined with the best practices of implementation, which requires a multidisciplinary effort between clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, to ensure the safety, accessibility, and ethical integrity of advancements. The success of facial reconstruction surgery cannot be attributed to technological sophistication alone, but also to the frequency of improvement in the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.