Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922819›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Education of First Nations Australians about cancer-what evidence is there around its effectiveness? A narrative review.

Carmel R Crook, Tiffany E Sandell, Emma V Taylor, Sandra C Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Indigenous Cancer Survivors in Peer Education and Community Knowledge Exchange: A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  2. Cervical Cancer Elimination Must Centre Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carmel R CrookThe Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth Street Glebe, New South Wales, 2037, Australia.
Tiffany E SandellThe Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth Street Glebe, New South Wales, 2037, Australia.
Emma V TaylorWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia, 6530, Australia.
Sandra C ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia, 6530, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poorer cancer prevention and control outcomes for First Nations Australians have resulted in a need for improved health literacy, that is their capacity as individuals to access, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. This narrative review explores the evidence on how education programs work to improve First Nations Australians' understanding of cancer, and how this leads to more effective use of prevention, screening and treatment services. Limited to the Australian context, a bibliographic search using terms structured around four main concepts: Aboriginal, Cancer, Australia, and Intervention (health literacy, health promotion) was undertaken in May 2024 for publications from January 2000. Studies that evaluated interventions or initiatives aimed to educate (that is, to increase awareness, knowledge and influence behaviours) across the cancer journey (excluding palliative care) were included. Fourteen evaluated initiatives drawn from peer-reviewed papers, published reports and peak body case studies were included in the review. All included papers were assessed with three major areas considered important for determining the effectiveness of cancer education for First Nations Australians: 1) acceptability: delivery in a format that is acceptable to community and health services, 2) impact: having a positive impact on people's access to and understanding of the cancer pathway and/or increases intended or actual participation, and 3) viability: successfully navigating the challenges of viably implementing, sustaining and scaling up an initiative. This review highlights several factors that contribute to the effectiveness of cancer education initiatives targeting First Nations Australians: culturally tailored initiatives, co-design and consultation during development, capacity building to create supportive, trusting environments for accessible cancer education; local ownership and empowerment, integration with existing healthcare systems, flexibility and multi-pronged approaches. Challenges and areas for further efforts in developing cancer health literacy are also described. Relatively few initiatives are evaluated: most of these have focussed on screening and treatment.

Indexed as

Aboriginal and Torres Strait IslanderAwarenessCancer educationCancer preventionCancer screeningFirst Nations AustralianHealth literacyHealth promotionIndigenousPreventionPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40922819
PMCPMC12414404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.