Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922804›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2025

Open Tibial Fractures Part 1: A Narrative Review of Initial Treatment and Potential Applicability to the Southern African Context.

Erik Hohmann, Maketo Molepo, Maritz Laubscher, Kevin Tetsworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik HohmannMedical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-8682
Maketo MolepoMedical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7306-4051
Maritz LaubscherDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5989-8383
Kevin TetsworthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3069-4141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment guidelines for open tibial fractures are well established in high-income countries, but their implementation in low-resource settings remains challenging. To date, only one African country has attempted to formulate national, consensus-based guidelines that cover key aspects such as antibiotic administration, initial stabilization, surgical debridement, wound management, and definitive fixation. This narrative review summarizes current principles for the initial management of open tibial shaft fractures and evaluates their relevance in the Southern African context, particularly in rural and resource-constrained environments. Given the limited availability of advanced imaging, specialized implants, and soft-tissue coverage expertise, clinicians must adapt existing protocols to local capacities. This review highlights areas where treatment recommendations from high-income settings may not be feasible and identifies practical considerations for applying initial management principles in Southern Africa. The need for context-specific, resource-appropriate guidelines is emphasized.

Indexed as

initial managementlow-resource countriesopen tibial fracturesreviewSouthern Africa

Identifiers

PMID40922804
PMCPMC12414457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.