ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2025
Open Tibial Fractures Part 1: A Narrative Review of Initial Treatment and Potential Applicability to the Southern African Context.
Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open Tibial Fractures Part 2: A Narrative Review of Definitive Treatment and Potential Applicability to the Southern African Context.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment guidelines for open tibial fractures are well established in high-income countries, but their implementation in low-resource settings remains challenging. To date, only one African country has attempted to formulate national, consensus-based guidelines that cover key aspects such as antibiotic administration, initial stabilization, surgical debridement, wound management, and definitive fixation. This narrative review summarizes current principles for the initial management of open tibial shaft fractures and evaluates their relevance in the Southern African context, particularly in rural and resource-constrained environments. Given the limited availability of advanced imaging, specialized implants, and soft-tissue coverage expertise, clinicians must adapt existing protocols to local capacities. This review highlights areas where treatment recommendations from high-income settings may not be feasible and identifies practical considerations for applying initial management principles in Southern Africa. The need for context-specific, resource-appropriate guidelines is emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.