ReviewJAACAP open2025
Systematic Review: A 25-Year Global Publication Analysis of the Role of Spirituality and Religiosity in Suicidal Risk Assessment in Adolescents.
Review in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to a Special Series on Youth Suicide.JAACAP open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Religiosity and spirituality have demonstrated protective associations against suicidal ideation and behavior in adults. Despite accumulating evidence of similar associations in adolescents, no systematic review to the authors' knowledge has examined associations between religiosity/spirituality and adolescent suicidality. The authors hypothesized that, in general, religiosity and spirituality would function as protective factors against suicidality in adolescent populations. This systematic review summarizes global findings on this topic, with particular focus on at-risk groups including racial, religious, and sexual minorities. Method: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies on December 18, 2023. Eligible articles were from peer-reviewed journals, included subjects ages 10 to 25, and employed measures of suicidality and religiosity/spirituality. Studies were evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 61 studies (340,170 participants); 49 were cross-sectional, 7 were longitudinal, and several were qualitative or used mixed methods. Of studies, 67.2% found protective associations between religiosity/spirituality and suicidality, 8.2% reported risk associations, 8.2% described complex associations, and 16.4% found no association. Mediators included general social support. Moderators included levels of parental monitoring. Studies of ethnoracially minoritized adolescents suggested a protective role for religiosity, whereas results in religiously minoritized and LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others) adolescents were equivocal. Conclusion: A substantial majority of studies demonstrated that greater investment in religiosity/spirituality predicted reduced suicidality in adolescents. Findings suggest that religiosity and spirituality can provide adolescents with reasons for living and should be addressed in clinical practice and prevention efforts. Limitations include the cross-sectional design of most included studies, preventing causal inferences. Future research should evaluate spiritually inclusive therapeutic and preventive interventions for adolescents. Study registration information: Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders among Indigenous Children: A Systematic Review; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021238669. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.