ArticleJAACAP open2025
Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Children: 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02709655 (Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Active-reference), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Active-reference (Fluoxetine), Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Patients Aged 7 to 11 Years, With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editors' Best of 2025.JAACAP open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children ages 7 to 11 years with major depressive disorder. Method: Patients meeting criteria for incomplete improvement in depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R] total score ≥40 plus <40% reduction and Parent Global Assessment Global Improvement score >2) after 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a brief psychosocial intervention plus placebo were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8-week double-blind treatment with brief psychosocial intervention and placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Following preplanned interim analysis, enrollment to fluoxetine was stopped, and patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg, or vortioxetine 20 mg. The primary end point was change in CDRS-R total score from baseline to week 8 for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo. Results: Of 683 patients enrolled in single-blind lead-in treatment, 540 were randomized to the double-blind period. The mean (SE) change from randomization to week 8 in CDRS-R total score for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo was -19.6 (1.2) and -17.5 (1.4), with a mean difference of -2.1 (1.2) (2-sided Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement in CDRS-R total score between placebo and vortioxetine; hence, efficacy of vortioxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder in children could not be confirmed. Safety and tolerability data were similar to that seen in adolescents and adults, with no outstanding safety concerns. Clinical trial registration information: Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Participants Aged 7 to 11 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.