ArticleAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2025
Assessing the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models to Assist Experts in the Development of Pharmacokinetic Models.
Article in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the potential of generative AI models to aid experts in developing scripts for pharmacokinetic (PK) models, with a focus on constructing a two-compartment population PK model using data from Hosseini et al. Methods: Generative AI tools ChatGPT v3.5, Gemini v2.0 Flash and Microsoft Copilot free could help PK professionals- even those without programming experience-learn the programming languages and skills needed for PK modeling. To evaluate these free AI tools, PK models were created in R Studio, covering key tasks in pharmacometrics and clinical pharmacology, including model descriptions, input requirements, results, and code generation, with a focus on reproducibility. Results: ChatGPT demonstrated superior performance compared to Copilot and Gemini, highlighting strong foundational knowledge, advanced concepts, and practical skills, including PK code structure and syntax. Validation indicated high accuracy in estimated and simulated plots, with minimal differences in clearance (Cl) and volume of distribution (V c and V p) compared to reference values. The metrics showed absolute fractional error (AFE), absolute average fractional error (AAFE), and mean percentage error (MPE) values of 0.99, 1.14, and -1.85, respectively. Conclusion: These results show that generative AI can effectively extract PK data from literature, build population PK models in R, and create interactive Shiny apps for visualization, with expert support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.