Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922650›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025

Unraveling novel mechanisms controlling heterosis in seeds: advances and biotechnological applications in crops.

Sara Belcapo, Elise Réthoré, Eric Nguema-Ona, Ignacio Ezquer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Flowering Newsletter Editorial 2025.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara BelcapoDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-6075-8143
Elise RéthoréPlant Nutrition R&D Department, Centre Mondial d'Innovation of Roullier Group, Saint-Malo, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2094-0118
Eric Nguema-OnaPlant Nutrition R&D Department, Centre Mondial d'Innovation of Roullier Group, Saint-Malo, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-9273
Ignacio EzquerDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-0095

Funding

Centre Mondial d'Innovation of Roullier GroupUniversity of Milan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis refers to the superior performance of hybrids over their parents (inbred lines) in one or more characteristics. Hence, understanding this process is crucial for addressing food insecurity. This review explores the traditional genetic models proposed to explain heterosis and integrates them with emerging perspectives such as epigenetic studies and multi-omics approaches, which are increasingly used to investigate the molecular basis of heterosis in plants. We focus especially on the role of heterosis on seed quality traits in different plant species, considering seed development as one of the most important steps in the plant life cycle. We examine how heterosis enhances plant establishment, growth and seed yield in hybrids compared with their parental lines. We also review the involvement of this process in tolerance and resistance against environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, and heat. While this review primarily focuses on seed biology impact of heterosis, we also discuss recent studies highlighting the role of heterosis in other key factors, such as the rhizosphere microbiome. Finally, we consider the use of recent technologies to broaden the spectrum of crops suitable for hybrid breeding.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCrops, AgriculturalHybrid VigorSeedsPlant BreedingAbiotic stresscereal researchheterosishybridsmolecular technologiesseed quality

Identifiers

PMID40922650
PMCPMC12675268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.