Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922644›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2026

Do Birthweight-For-Gestational Age Centiles Predict Serious Neonatal Morbidity and Neonatal Mortality?

Sid John, K S Joseph, John Fahey, Shiliang Liu, Sarka Lisonkova, Michael S Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sid JohnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1119-8772
K S JosephDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
John FaheyThe Reproductive Care Program of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shiliang LiuCentre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sarka LisonkovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael S KramerDepartment of Epidemiology and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP-67125CIHR PJT153439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies show that foetal and birthweight-for-gestational age centiles are poor predictors of serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality (SNMM) in univariable models.

objectiveWe assessed the predictive performance of multivariable SNMM models based on maternal/pregnancy characteristics, with and without birthweight centiles.

methodsThe study was based on all live births in the United States, 2019-2021, with data obtained from the period live birth-infant death files of the National Center for Health Statistics. SNMM was defined as any one or more of the following: 5-minute Apgar score < 4, seizures, assisted ventilation for> 30 or neonatal death. SNMM was modelled by log-linear regression on maternal/pregnancy characteristics as predictors, with and without birthweight centiles. Models were developed for live births at 24-42 weeks' and 39 weeks' gestation to all women and those with hypertensive disorders or pre-existing diabetes. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC).

resultsThe study population included 10,487,243 live births and 221,728 SNMM cases (2.1 per 100 live births). The models with all live births at 24-42 weeks' gestation had AUCs of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82, 0.83) based on maternal/pregnancy characteristics and 0.83 (95% CI 0.83, 0.84) based on maternal/pregnancy characteristics and birthweight centiles. However, AUCs of models based on all live births at 39 weeks' gestation were 0.66 (95% CI 0.64, 0.68) with maternal/pregnancy characteristics and 0.69 (95% CI 0.68, 0.71) with maternal/pregnancy characteristics and birthweight centiles. AUCs of the models with live births at 39 weeks' gestation to women with pre-existing diabetes were 0.69 (95% CI 0.66, 0.72) based on maternal/pregnancy characteristics, and 0.77 (95% CI 0.74, 0.79) with the addition of birthweight centiles.

conclusionsBirthweight centiles improve multivariable SNMM predictive performance in specific subpopulations, although evaluation of decision thresholds is required to determine the clinical importance of improvement in predictive ability.

Indexed as

Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, Newborn, DiseasesAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyUnited Statesarea under the curvebirthweightbirthweight‐for‐gestational ageneonatal mortalitypredictionserious neonatal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID40922644
PMCPMC13124685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.