ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2025
Developmental outcomes of small infants at a high-risk clinic: A short-term longitudinal study.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall infants face more developmental risks than their full-term peers, necessitating early intervention and long-term monitoring.
objectivesThis study examined the longitudinal developmental and hearing outcomes of small infants attending a high-risk clinic in a South African low-income community setting.
methodA short-term longitudinal within-subject descriptive study design was employed, where 28 participants underwent hearing and developmental screenings and assessments at two follow-up appointments (T1 and T2), at 6- and 12-month corrected age. Developmental outcomes, such as communication, motor and daily living skills, were evaluated using developmental screening tools (Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status [PEDS]), hearing screening (ABR MB11) and developmental assessments (Vineland-3).
resultsAll participants underwent hearing screening, with four (14.3%) failing twice (T1 and T2) and being referred for diagnostic evaluation. Developmental screening at T1 identified concerns in communication, gross motor and social-emotional skills (28.5%). Concerns persisted across T1 and T2 in the PEDS tool, with fine motor skills emerging as a key issue at T2. Vineland-3 assessments showed improvement from T1 to T2; initial concerns in daily living (M = 104.12; standard deviation [s.d.] = 38.99) and motor skills (M = 88.82; s.d. = 45.26) were no longer present at T2, where all participants had age-appropriate developmental scores.
conclusionThe findings highlight the need for comprehensive, routine developmental monitoring and early intervention to address delays in small infants. Continued follow-up care and support from birth to 12 months corrected age can improve outcomes and caregiver developmental literacy. Contribution: This study provides valuable insights for caregivers, healthcare policymakers and early intervention professionals by emphasising the importance of early screening, continuous monitoring and caregiver education in optimising developmental outcomes for small infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.