Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922615›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025

Digital pulse: Social media reaction to South Africa's National Health Insurance implementation.

Hlabje C Masemola, Mutshidzi A Mulondo, Sphamandla J Nkambule, Bafana Madida, Raikane J Seretlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hlabje C MasemolaDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein. Masemolahc@ufs.ac.za.
Mutshidzi A Mulondo
Sphamandla J Nkambule
Bafana Madida
Raikane J Seretlo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media has become a platform where unheard voices within different communities are shared with government.

aimThe study explored and described expressed reactions of social media users regarding the implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.

settingThis study was conducted online on existing social media platforms that share current news. These social media platforms included X (formerly known as Twitter), Facebook, Instagram and TikTok.

methodsThis was a qualitative study that applied an explorative-descriptive approach. Using convenience sampling, raw data from screenshots of the first 10 social media users' reactions from each news media company were collected. The authors collected information verbatim from the screenshots and created two main transcripts with 10 reactions from each of the selected news media accounts. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.

resultsEight main themes emerged from the reactions of the users. These include concerns about the public financial and taxation burden, corruption and mismanagement by the government, concerns about the quality of healthcare services, fear of medical staff exodus, issues of equity and access to healthcare, government's political motives and electioneering, user's preference for improving current public healthcare system and doubts about NHI implementation feasibility.

conclusionThe findings emphasise the need for government officials to include the community before introducing, signing and implementing different bills.Contribution: Through highlighting the public's sentiments on challenges, readiness and feasibility of implementing the NHI, policymakers will be encouraged to ensure adequate health communication and community participation.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsSocial MediaHumansQualitative ResearchSouth Africaimplementationreactionssocial mediaSouth Africa National Health InsuranceUniversal Health Coverage

Identifiers

PMID40922615
PMCPMC12506820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.