ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025
Differentiated antiretroviral distribution: Implementation in five South African districts.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Department of Health introduced Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) models to improve retention in care and decongest healthcare facilities. Anova Health Institute supported the implementation of DSD guidelines in five districts of South Africa.
aimThe study aimed to describe how the models contained in DSD policies are operationalised.
settingFive districts of South Africa - two metropolitan, two mixed and one rural.
methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a 2-day participatory workshop in 2023 and a retrospective review of routine programmatic data. A mapping exercise was used to understand all models of chronic medication provision in the five study districts and to describe differences in operationalisation. We also report on the number of options per facility and healthcare provider perspectives of benefits and limitations.
resultsExternal and facility pick-up points were the most commonly implemented models. Three key themes were: the trade-off between convenience and additional support, the trade-off between controlling client care and outsourcing tasks and the distribution of work between cadres of staff. Sedibeng District provided the most options per facility, with 57% of facilities having three possible options. Cape Town provided the fewest, with 50% of facilities offering only one option.
conclusionHealth and environmental contexts guide the choice of DSD modalities offered. It is possible to offer clients options in South African settings.Contribution: This study highlights the context-specific nature of DSD model implementation and the importance of client choice. Further research into availability and options from a client perspective would be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.