Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922539›Full record

Trial reportExperimental dermatology2025

Visible Light-Induced Pigmentation: Improved In Vivo Methodology for Measuring Efficacy of 30 Products in 9 Randomised Controlled Trials and Correlation With In Vitro Assessment.

Pascale Renoux, Hussein Jouni, Clément Laloux, Rita Touti, Diane-Lore Vieu, François Lamarche, Silvia Morim Santos, Françoise Bernerd, Claire Marionnet

9 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06796010 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effect of Four Sunscreens on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsVisible Light Exposure, Healthy Back SkinArmsVisible Light Exposure - Treated zones, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone
NCT06796088 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effects of Three Sunscreen Products on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsStudy the Potency of Sunscreen to Protect Against the Pigmentation Induced by Visible Light Exposure on Healthy Back SkinArmsTreated zones exposed to Visible Light source, Untreated zone exposed to Visible Light source
NCT06796140 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effect of a Sunscreen on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Using Two Different Simulators, Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsVisible Light Exposures on Healthy Back SkinArmsVisible Light Exposure - Treated zone - Left hemi-back, Visible Light Exposure - Treated zone - Right hemi-back, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone - Left hemi-back, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone - Right hemi-back
NCT06796153 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effect of Different Topical Agents on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with a Not Treated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsVisible Light Exposure on Healthy Back SkinArmsVisible Light Exposure - Treated zones, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone
NCT06796179 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effects of Seven Sunscreen Products on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsVisible Light Exposure on Healthy Back SkinArmsVisible Light Exposure - Treated zones with sunscreen products, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone
NCT06796192 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effect of Three Sunscreens on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2017 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsStudy the Protection Potency of Sunscreen Products Against Pigmentation Induced by Visible Light Exposure on Healthy Back SkinArmsVisible Light Exposure - Treated zones, Visible Light Exposure - Untreated zone
NCT06796205 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effects of Three Sunscreen Products on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsVisible Light Exposure on Healthy Back SkinArmsTreated zones exposed with Visible Light source, Untreated zone exposed with Visible Light source
NCT06803901 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Protective Effect of Three Sunscreens on Visible Light Induced Pigmentation Compared with an Untreated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsEfficacy of Sunscreen Products, Healthy Back Skin, Pigmentation Induced by Visible Light Exposure
NCT06827392 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Protective Effect of Three Laboratoire VICHY Formulations on the Pigmentation Induced by Visible Light in Comparison with a Non-treated Control Zone

TypeobservationalSponsorCosmetique Active InternationalRan2016 to 2016Enrolled20ConditionsEfficiency of Agents, Against Pigmentation Induced by Visible Light Exposures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pascale RenouxL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Chevilly Larue, France.
Hussein JouniL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-3161
Clément LalouxCencora-PharmaLex Belgium, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0714-7077
Rita ToutiL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Chevilly Larue, France.
Diane-Lore VieuL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.
François LamarcheL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.
Silvia Morim SantosL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.
Françoise BernerdL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.
Claire MarionnetL'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay sous Bois, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-2001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As hyperpigmentation can worsen with exposure to ultraviolet (UV) and visible light (VL), sunscreens with well-balanced UVB/UVA protection and VL-blocking pigments are recommended. Assessing efficiency against VL-induced pigmentation is then mandatory. Recently, an in vivo pigmentation assessment allowing a VL protection factor (pVL-PF) determination, and an in vitro predictive method based on transmittance measures were introduced. However, the number of volunteers, tested sunscreens, and protection range were limited. Moreover, no statistical assessment was associated. This study aimed at testing the robustness and improving these methodologies by conducting a series of 9 monocentric, double-blind, randomised controlled in vivo studies involving 188 volunteers and 30 products, alongside an in vitro approach, in 2 independent laboratories. Our results first allowed us to improve pVL-PF calculation by better fitting to VL-induced pigmentation dynamics. Based on the 30 established pVL-PF, we evidenced that VL-protection level strongly correlated with the amount of pigments in products. Second, a statistical Bayesian approach, accounting for kinetic and inter-individual response variability over time, was proposed. This enabled us to determine that 24 out of 30 products significantly reduced VL-induced pigmentation. Finally, we showed that in vitro transmittance reduction was highly predictive of in vivo results. In conclusion, through several independent studies involving a large number of products and volunteers, a refined pVL-PF calculation associated with statistical indicators was proposed together with a predictive in vitro assessment. These methodologies to assess the efficacy of tinted products against VL-induced pigmentation are complementary and could also be of interest for other pathologies induced or aggravated by VL. Trial Registration: NCT06827392, NCT06796192, NCT06803901, NCT06796140, NCT06796153, NCT06796010, NCT06796088, NCT06796205, NCT06796179.

Indexed as

HyperpigmentationLightSkin PigmentationSunscreening AgentsAdultBayes TheoremDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUltraviolet RaysYoung AdultSunscreening Agentsphotoprotectionpigmentationprotection factorsunscreensvisible light

Identifiers

PMID40922539
PMCPMC12417931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 3 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.