ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025
Influence of medical educational background on the diagnostic quality of ChatGPT-4 responses in internal medicine: A pilot study.
Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The search for the best sustainable foods requires accurate and comprehensive functional assessment oriented to health.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Influence of medical educational background on the diagnostic quality of ChatGPT-4 responses in internal medicine: A pilot study.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Tango between obesogenic environment and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): shifting towards earlier detection.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study evaluated the influence of medical background on the diagnostic quality of ChatGPT-4's responses in Internal Medicine. Third-year students, residents and specialists summarised five complex NEJM clinical cases before querying ChatGPT-4. Diagnostic ranking, assessed by independent experts, revealed that residents significantly outperformed students (OR 2.33, p = .007); though overall performance was low. These findings indicate that user expertise and concise case summaries are critical for optimising AI diagnostics, highlighting the need for enhanced AI training and user interaction strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.