ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025
Performance of Rapid Clonotyping of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using Flongle Flow-Cell Nanopore Sequencing of IGH Rearrangements.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of Rapid Clonotyping of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using Flongle Flow-Cell Nanopore Sequencing of IGH Rearrangements.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClonotyping of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangements is critical for diagnosis, prognostication, and measurable residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, such as Illumina MiSeq, are widely used, they face challenges in spanning full VDJ rearrangements. Long-read sequencing via Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers a potential alternative using the compact and cost-effective flow cells.
methodsWe evaluated IGH clonotyping in samples from 13 CLL patients using ONT MinION with Flongle flow cells and super-accuracy GPU-based base calling (Dorado), comparing results to MiSeq-based LymphoTrack assays. Amplicons were generated using the IGH FR1 assay and analyzed using Smith-Waterman alignment and IgBlast tools.
resultsAll major and minor clonotypes identified by MiSeq were matched with 100% sequence identity using Nanopore sequencing. Clonal burden estimates were strongly correlated (Pearson ρ = 0.87, p < 10
conclusionNanopore sequencing enables accurate and rapid IGH clonotyping in CLL, offering comparable performance to MiSeq with lower cost and laboratory footprint. This supports its potential utility in routine and decentralized hematopathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.