Observational studyActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026
Video-Based Evaluation of Checklist Adherence on a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimSuccessful procedural performance in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) depends on skill performance and preparation. Checklists are beneficial, and video reviewing enhances adherence to guidelines. This study assessed whether video recordings can be used to assess checklist deviations, the extent to which proceduralists (doctors from 1 to ≥ 6 years of experience) deviate from checklists, and whether video recordings can help to improve existing and create new checklists.
methodsIn this single-center study at the tertiary NICU of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, fifty-one videos from six different procedures were analyzed: (i) intubation, (ii) insertion of a chest drain, (iii) insertion of an umbilical venous catheter (UVC), (iv) insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC), (v) lumbar puncture (LP), and (vi) puncture of Ommaya reservoir. Each step was scored using a 4-point scale (-1 to 2) using the corresponding checklist.
resultsTwenty proceduralists performed the 51 videos. 78% of all checklist steps were assessable through video analysis. Deviations were identified in each procedure (10%-17.9%). We created two new checklists by analyzing video recordings.
conclusionChecklist deviations occur regularly and can be detected by analyzing clinical video recordings. Video recordings are useful to revise existing and create new checklists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.