ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
How women respond to uncertainty in the context of genetic screening: A qualitative analysis framed by the uncertainty tolerance model.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How women respond to uncertainty in the context of genetic screening: A qualitative analysis framed by the uncertainty tolerance model.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, individuals can seek genetic risk information for multiple conditions. However, feasibility and communication challenges could arise if offering multiple genetic tests simultaneously, such as cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening for pregnancy planning. Genetic screening introduces uncertainty from probabilistic results, ambiguous gene-disease associations, and complex variant interpretation, intertwining with psychosocial concerns impacting decision-making and emotional well-being. This study utilized coding reliability thematic analysis with both a deductive and inductive approach using the uncertainty tolerance model as a framework to explore how reproductive-age women perceive and respond to uncertainty in the context of genetic screening. Through in-depth interviews with 20 women recruited from obstetrics/gynecology clinics, the study revealed cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to uncertainty. Participants lacked familiarity with genetic screening but expressed interest in learning more. Positive cognitive responses were associated with desires for proactive health management, while negative responses often stemmed from concerns about test accuracy and potential side effects. Emotional responses ranged from hope and excitement to fear and anxiety, shaping information-seeking behaviors. The study underscores the importance of tailored patient education and communication strategies in genetic counseling to address uncertainty, support informed choice, and alleviate distress. The findings offer insights for improving genetic counseling practices and enhancing patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.