Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922471›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

How women respond to uncertainty in the context of genetic screening: A qualitative analysis framed by the uncertainty tolerance model.

Yi Liao, Anne C Madeo, Lingzi Zhong, Wendy Kohlmann, Erin Rothwell, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi LiaoDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4654-9739
Anne C MadeoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Lingzi ZhongDepartment of Communication, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Wendy KohlmannClinical Cancer Genetics Service, Veterans TeleOncology Program, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Erin RothwellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Utah Center of Excellence in ELSI Research: UCEERRM1HG009037 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROTHWELL, ERIN, TABERY, JAMES · 2016 to 2024
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA042014NHGRI NIH HHS RM1HG009037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, individuals can seek genetic risk information for multiple conditions. However, feasibility and communication challenges could arise if offering multiple genetic tests simultaneously, such as cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening for pregnancy planning. Genetic screening introduces uncertainty from probabilistic results, ambiguous gene-disease associations, and complex variant interpretation, intertwining with psychosocial concerns impacting decision-making and emotional well-being. This study utilized coding reliability thematic analysis with both a deductive and inductive approach using the uncertainty tolerance model as a framework to explore how reproductive-age women perceive and respond to uncertainty in the context of genetic screening. Through in-depth interviews with 20 women recruited from obstetrics/gynecology clinics, the study revealed cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to uncertainty. Participants lacked familiarity with genetic screening but expressed interest in learning more. Positive cognitive responses were associated with desires for proactive health management, while negative responses often stemmed from concerns about test accuracy and potential side effects. Emotional responses ranged from hope and excitement to fear and anxiety, shaping information-seeking behaviors. The study underscores the importance of tailored patient education and communication strategies in genetic counseling to address uncertainty, support informed choice, and alleviate distress. The findings offer insights for improving genetic counseling practices and enhancing patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUncertaintycancer preventiongenetic screeningreproductionuncertaintyuncertainty tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40922471
PMCPMC12417769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.