Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922451›Full record

Observational studyCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025

Impact of Epicardial plaQUe Composition and geomeTry on Coronary hEmodynamics and Flow in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (iEquate).

Avedis Ekmejian, Usaid Allahwala, Rahul Bahl, Sayan Sen, Ricardo Petraco, Michael Ward, Ravinay Bhindi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Epicardial plaQUe Composition and geomeTry on Coronary hEmodynamics and Flow in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (iEquate).Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Avedis EkmejianRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-7372
Usaid AllahwalaRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.
Rahul BahlImperial College, London, UK.
Sayan SenImperial College, London, UK.
Ricardo PetracoImperial College, London, UK.
Michael WardRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.
Ravinay BhindiRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive coronary physiology including fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are guideline-endorsed tools to guide the management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Complex factors impact and confound these assessments, and discordance between modalities complicates clinical management. iEquate is a prospective observational trial that combines multi-modality coronary physiology and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to identify the determinants of pressure-wire derived myocardial ischemia and iFR-FFR discordance.

methodsAll patients referred for invasive angiography who met the pre-selection criteria were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients underwent physiological assessment using iFR and FFR, and CFR was performed as indicated. OCT was performed on all suitable lesions. Data were collected on baseline demographics, angiographic results, OCT findings, coronary physiology, and procedural details. Multivariate analysis was performed.

resultsA total of 124 vessels were analyzed from 107 patients. The mean age was 67.6 ( ± 10.8) years, and 23 patients (21.5%) were female. Eighty (74.8%) presented with stable angina, and the most common vessel assessed was the left anterior descending artery (n = 84, 67.7% of patients). The incidence of iFR-FFR discordance was 20.7%, with 48% of these iFR+FFR-. Calcific plaque was associated with discordance (OR 6.15 [95% CI [1.05-36.13]; p = 0.04), largely with a iFR+FFR- pattern (OR 7.62 [95% CI 0.38-152.15]; p = 0.184). Other morphological features were not predictive of FFR, iFR, or CFR findings. Mean CFR was significantly lower in the iFR+FFR- subgroup compared to FFR+iFR- (mean difference 1.4; p < 0.01).

conclusionsiFR-FFR discordance is common, and impaired vasodilatory capacity (assessed using CFR) may account for some of these cases. In this study, calcific plaque was associated with discordance, while other OCT-derived plaque morphological characteristics were not associated with invasive coronary physiology findings. Cross-sectional plaque eccentricity is associated with lower FFR values.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHemodynamicsPericardiumPlaque, AtheroscleroticTomography, Optical CoherenceVascular CalcificationAgedCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Testscoronary physiologydiscordanceFFRiFROCTplaque morphology

Identifiers

PMID40922451
PMCPMC12584577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.