Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922386›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Exploring spatial understanding and cognitive load using ultrasound in learning cardiac anatomy: A pilot study.

Johanna Maria de Lange, Karin J Baatjes, Wouter Willaert, Janine C Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Maria de LangeDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-7990
Karin J BaatjesDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-8844
Wouter WillaertDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-6749
Janine C CorreiaDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-9889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ultrasound (US) appears to complement traditional anatomy teaching, limited objective data exist on its efficacy. Existing literature often relies on student perceptions rather than performance-based outcomes. Additionally, the role of spatial understanding (SU)-the ability to mentally manipulate and interpret 3D anatomical relationships-and cognitive load (CL)-the mental effort required to learn-remains underexplored in the context of US-based instruction. The study consisted of three parts, with assessments before and after the US session. Prior to the session, students completed two paper-based tests on SU and cardiovascular system (CVS) anatomy. During the session, cardiac anatomy was explored through an introduction to US physics, a practical demonstration, and hands-on practice. Post-session, SU and CVS knowledge were reassessed, and participants completed a CL Scale Questionnaire. Thirty-one students participated in the study. Pre- and post-testing of CVS anatomy knowledge showed a mean increase of 11.33% (p < 0.05), while participants' mean SU scores improved from 65.71% to 81.04% (p < 0.05). The highest student rating on the CL Scale was observed when measuring the germane load, specifically the item assessing perceived learning (8.55 ± 1.31), while the lowest rating was reported for measurement of extraneous load, particularly the item assessing distractions (1.23 ± 1.61). This study provided insightful reports on the efficacy of US on SU and CL in anatomy education, showing its potential to improve learning outcomes and prepare students for clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnatomyCardiovascular SystemCognitionHeartStudents, MedicalAdultComprehensionCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLearningMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairescardiac anatomycognitive loadmedical educationspatial understandingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40922386
PMCPMC12592905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.