Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40922039›Full record

SynthesisContact dermatitis2025

Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Rubber Accelerators From the European Baseline Series in Dermatitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Daniel Isufi, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Mikkel Bak Jensen, Kian Karimian, Claus Zachariae, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen, Farzad Alinaghi, Jeanne Duus Johansen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contact dermatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Contact Dermatitis among Hospital Cleaners in Dar es Salaam: Prevalence and Associated Factors.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel IsufiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte - Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2780-3604
Christoffer Kursawe LarsenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-9198
Mikkel Bak JensenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-5735
Kian KarimianDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte - Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Claus ZachariaeDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte - Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Jakob Ferløv Baselius SchwensenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9756-656X
Farzad AlinaghiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte - Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-4242
Jeanne Duus JohansenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-8463

Funding

The Danish Environmental Protection Agency under the Ministry of Environment of Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubber accelerators are chemicals used as vulcanizers in the production of rubber items and may cause contact allergy (CA). The aim of this study was to assess the worldwide prevalence of CA to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series among dermatitis patients. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science yielded 106 studies with 826 543 individuals patch tested between 1984 and 2023. Meta-analysis showed pooled prevalence rates of 2.55% for thiuram mix, 0.86% for mercapto mix, and 0.83% for mercaptobenzothiazole. Marked geographical variations were observed: North America and Asian regions showed the highest prevalences whereas Europe had lower rates. Comparisons before and after the year 2000 revealed a decline in CA to all three accelerators. Sub-analysis of the extended rubber series revealed the prevalence of CA to tetraethylthiuram disulphide of 3.73% and to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate of 0.60%. The prevalence of CA to carba mix was 3.96%. These findings underscore the public health implications of rubber accelerator-induced CA. Strengthened preventive measures and regulatory efforts, including improved labelling, safe limits of rubber gloves, and reduced use of high-risk accelerators are needed to mitigate disease burden. The results emphasise a need for ongoing surveillance, especially concerning extended rubber series.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, Allergic ContactDermatitis, OccupationalRubberBenzothiazolesEuropeHumansPatch TestsPrevalenceThiocarbamatesThiramBenzothiazolescaptaxRubberThiocarbamatesThiramallergic contact dermatitiscontact allergyepidemiologyprevalencerubber accelerators

Identifiers

PMID40922039
PMCPMC12586283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.