ArticleBMC health services research2025
Information and support for cancer patients and their relatives - evaluation of central contact point enquiries: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich has established a central contact point for cancer patients and their caregivers, which is associated with a multidisciplinary supportive care center. The platform facilitates multifaceted enquiries about access to supportive care, second opinions and specialist care. The aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of the contact platform during a period of 31 months.
methodsThe analysis was sourced from data regarding contact information gathered between January 1, 2022, and July 31, 2024. The dataset was completed by Privacy Preserving Record Linkage, using the tumor documentation data.
resultsWithin 31 months, a total of 1226 enquiries were documented, originating from 1058 distinct individuals. The three most common requests were for second opinions (39%), supportive care consultations (37%) and treatment options (16%). 51.5% of the individuals of the cohort were younger than 60 years old. Age groups ≥ 70 years and above were underrepresented compared to the general population of cancer patients in Germany. Women were overrepresented (65.1%). Supportive counseling was mostly requested by women (75.5%). 72.5% of the individuals that contacted the service were patients and 27.5% relatives or friends. While enquiries about second opinions and supportive care mostly came directly from the patients, the majority (55%) enquiries about treatment options were made by associated persons.
conclusionsThis dataset provided valuable insights as to how the central contact platform service is utilized. These insights will serve to properly address patients' information needs thereby improving access for underrepresented groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.