ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Comparison of renal effects between sacubitril/valsartan and thiazide diuretics among patients with uncontrolled hypertension and chronic kidney disease in Japan.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSacubitril/valsartan is typically prescribed for patients with heart failure and hypertension. We previously reported that sacubitril/valsartan provides comparable blood pressure (BP) reduction and superior tolerability compared to thiazide diuretics. This post hoc study aimed to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan and thiazide diuretics in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsAmong patients with poorly controlled BP in the office or at home despite combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, 611 patients were included: those treated with thiazide diuretics (THZ group) and those who were switched from RAS inhibitors to sacubitril/valsartan for the next 12 months. After implementing multiple methods, 505 patients with CKD (n = 211 in the THZ group and n = 294 in the SacVal group) were analyzed using propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting.
resultCompared to the THZ group, the SacVal group demonstrated significantly reduced systolic office BP, uric acid, and glycated hemoglobin A
conclusionCompared to the addition of thiazide diuretics, the transition to sacubitril/valsartan resulted in greater BP reduction and more favorable changes in uric acid, HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
40921928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.