Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921920›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Comparative Analysis of Total Cost of Ownership: Commercial-Grade versus Diagnostic-Grade Displays in Remote Radiology Workstations.

Katie Hulme, Jennifer Arnold, Ryan Thomas, Roy Kittelberger, Namita Gandhi, Douglas Nachand, Po-Hao Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie HulmeMedical Physics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. hulmek@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7541-6894
Jennifer ArnoldImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ryan ThomasImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3686-5878
Roy KittelbergerImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Namita GandhiImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6456-9453
Douglas NachandImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-491X
Po-Hao ChenImaging Informatics, Diagnostics Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-5289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing shift towards remote radiology work, institutions face the challenge of balancing cost-effectiveness with operational reliability. This experiential report presents a comparative analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of commercial-grade displays (WCDs) and diagnostic-grade displays (WDDs) in remote diagnostic stations. We evaluate direct and indirect costs associated with each display type using activity-based costing, focusing on deployment, quality control (QC) processes, and ongoing maintenance. Our findings suggest that while CGDs offer significant initial cost savings, their long-term maintenance requirements, particularly in manual QC, increase recurring expenses. The crossover point for CGDs with monthly QC occurs at approximately five years against mid-level DGDs, potentially making DGDs a more sustainable option over time.

Indexed as

OwnershipRadiology Information SystemsTeleradiologyCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansCost of ownershipDICOM-GSDFDisplaysQuality controlRemote radiology

Identifiers

PMID40921920
PMCPMC13230377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.