ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical significance of intraoperative dissection time and machine learning-based prediction in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Assessment Tool for In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients with Postoperative Hypoxemia Following Non-Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative complications after transanal total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting MASLD in Gallstone Patients: An Interpretable Machine Learning Model with External Validation.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough many studies have developed logistic regression models for predicting complications using preoperative and intraoperative data, none have applied comprehensive perioperative information with machine learning (ML) to enable time-sequential predictions.
methodsThis study included patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery between 2013 and 2019 at two hospitals. Comprehensive perioperative data were collected. Four ML models were developed: the postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 models predicted complications occurring from POD 2 and POD 4, while the 24-h and 8-h models predicted complications within the 24 and 8 h, respectively, after collection of the most recent biochemical data and vital signs. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with repeated validation for generalizability.
resultsAmong 4139 patients, 782 (18.9%) experienced complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II). The 8-h model achieved the highest AUC (0.737) for overall complications. The POD 3 model outperformed the POD 1 model, with AUCs exceeding 0.8 for pancreatic fistula (0.869) and intra-abdominal abscess (0.821). The 8-h and the 24-h model both achieved AUCs above 0.8 for specific infectious complications. The 8-h model demonstrated the following AUCs: 0.889 for pancreatic fistula, 0.842 for intra-abdominal abscess, 0.826 for pneumonia, and 0.824 for anastomotic leakage, surpassing all POD-based models. In each 8-h model, C-reactive protein, pulse rate, and intraoperative blood loss consistently emerged as significant variables.
conclusionHour-based ML models incorporating comprehensive perioperative data predict post-gastric cancer surgery complications with high accuracy and time-sequential capability, potentially aiding clinical decision-making and improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40921854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.