Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921850›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Improving applications of a design-comparable effect size in single-case designs.

Yi-Kai Chen, Tong-Rong Yang, Li-Ting Chen, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Che Cheng, Po-Ju Wu, Chao-Ying Joanne Peng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi-Kai ChenDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-5529
Tong-Rong YangDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-0769
Li-Ting ChenDepartment of Educational Studies, University of Nevada, Reno/MS 299, Reno, NV, 89557, USA. litingc@unr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-0548
Cheng-Yu HsiehDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-1435
Che ChengDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-7833
Po-Ju WuNevada Department of Health and Human Services, Carson City, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3608-5259
Chao-Ying Joanne PengDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7282-5461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

g

Indexed as

Research DesignSingle-Case Studies as TopicData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeConvergenceDesign-comparableEffect sizeMaximum likelihoodSingle-caseStandardized mean difference

Identifiers

PMID40921850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.