ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for 10-20 mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors based on resection margin status.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) smaller than 10 mm can be treated by endoscopic resection, whereas tumors larger than 20 mm should be treated by surgical resection. However, the optimal treatment of 10-20 mm rectal NETs remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for 10-20 mm rectal NETs based on resection margin status.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 190 patients with 10-20 mm rectal NETs who underwent ESD at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The preoperative baseline information, procedure-related characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
resultsThe mean maximal diameter was 11.8 ± 2.5 mm, with 156 lesions at 10-14 mm and 34 lesions at 15-20 mm. The en bloc resection rate and technical success rate were both 100%. The mean procedure duration was 28.54 ± 13.23 min, with 56 (29.5%) procedures lasting > 30 min. There were only 2 cases of fever over 38.5 °C and 2 cases of delayed bleeding. All patients were eventually discharged safely and the mean hospital stay after procedure was 1.68 ± 0.82 days. Tumor grade was G1 in 136 (71.6%) patients and G2 in 54 (28.4%) patients. Positive margins were found in 42 patients, including 6 cases (3.2%) with lateral margin involvement, 35 cases (18.4%) with basal margin involvement and one case with both. The mean follow-up was 48.39 ± 27.12 months, with only 3 recurrences. The recurrence rate in the positive margin group was not higher than that in the negative margin group. Estimated progression-free survival and overall survival were also not significantly different between the two groups.
conclusionsESD is a safe and effective technique for 10-20 mm rectal NETs. With limited follow-up time, there may be no relationship between tumor margin and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40921837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.