SynthesisEuropean radiology2026
Prediction of oncogene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a special focus on artificial intelligence-based methods.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting T790M mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer based on radiomics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Radiomics in Lung Cancer Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Precision Lung Cancer Care: From Early Detection to Clinical Decision Support.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence inCancers · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in non-small cell lung cancer: transforming diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Radiomics to understand pre-treatment tumor biology for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Risk factors for misclassification in predicting EGFR mutation status using PET/CT imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), non-invasive alternatives to biopsy-dependent driver mutation analysis are needed. We reviewed the effectiveness of radiomics alone or with clinical data and assessed the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting oncogene mutation status. MATERIALS AND
methodsA PRISMA-compliant literature review for studies predicting oncogene mutation status in NSCLC patients using radiomics was conducted by a multidisciplinary team. Meta-analyses evaluating the performance of AI-based models developed with CT-derived radiomics features alone or combined with clinical data were performed. A meta-regression to analyze the influence of different predictors was also conducted.
resultsOf 890 studies identified, 124 evaluating models for the prediction of epidermal growth factor-1 (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutations were included in the systematic review, of which 51 were meta-analyzed. The AI algorithms' sensitivity/false positive rate (FPR) in predicting mutation status using radiomics-based models was 0.754 (95% CI 0.727-0.780)/0.344 (95% CI 0.308-0.381) for EGFR, 0.754 (95% CI 0.638-0.841)/0.225 (95% CI 0.163-0.302) for ALK and 0.475 (95% CI 0.153-0.820)/0.181 (95% CI 0.054-0.461) for KRAS. A meta-analysis of combined models was possible for EGFR mutation, revealing a sensitivity of 0.806 (95% CI 0.777-0.833) and a FPR of 0.315 (95% CI 0.270-0.364). No statistically significant results were obtained in the meta-regression.
conclusionsRadiomics-based models may offer a non-invasive alternative for determining oncogene mutation status in NSCLC. Further research is required to analyze whether clinical data might boost their performance. KEY POINTS: Question Can imaging-based radiomics and artificial intelligence non-invasively predict oncogene mutation status to improve diagnosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Findings Radiomics-based models achieved high performance in predicting mutation status in NSCLC; adding clinical data showed limited improvement in predictive performance. Clinical relevance Radiomics and AI tools offer a non-invasive strategy to support molecular profiling in NSCLC. Validation studies addressing clinical and methodological aspects are essential to ensure their reliability and integration into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.