Trial reportNature medicine2025
Heterologous two-dose Ebola vaccine regimen in pregnant women in Rwanda: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04556526 (A Phase 3 Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of a 2-dose Ebola Vaccine Regimen of Ad26.ZEBOV Followed by MVA-BN-Filo in Healthy Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of a 2-dose Ebola Vaccine Regimen of Ad26.ZEBOV Followed by MVA-BN-Filo in Healthy Pregnant Women
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Ebola vaccine safe for mothers and infants.Nature medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk of death for both mother and fetus following Ebola virus infection is extremely high. In this study, healthy women in Rwanda aged ≥18 years were randomized to two-dose Ebola vaccination (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo) during pregnancy (group A) or postpartum (group B). Unvaccinated pregnant group B women served as control. This was a parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint-outcomes of interest and serious adverse events (SAEs)) and immunogenicity (secondary endpoint) of the two-dose Ebola vaccination. Among 3,484 women screened, 2,013 were randomized, and 2,012 women and 1,945 infants born alive were descriptively analyzed. Adverse outcomes of interest occurred in women (5.2% in group A and 7.3% in group B) and infants (26.0% in group A and 25.6% in group B). The most common maternal outcome of interest was pathways to preterm birth (3.2% in group A and 3.4% in group B), and the most common infant outcome of interest was small for gestational age (14.3% in group A and 11.8% in group B). Maternal/fetal and neonatal/infant SAE frequencies were comparable between groups (9.8% in group A, 9.0% in group B and 21.9% in group A, 15.9% in group B, respectively). Anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein-specific binding antibody response (secondary endpoint) was sustained in ≥90% of women at 1 year postdose 1. In group A, binding antibodies were detected in cord blood (99%) and infant serum (95%) samples 14 weeks postbirth. The trial met all primary and secondary objectives. Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo did not raise concerns regarding adverse maternal/fetal or neonatal/infant outcomes, had no unexpected safety issues, and induced binding antibody responses in women and offspring through passive transfer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04556526 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.