ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Sustainability in the Interventional Radiology Suite: Environmental and Financial Implications.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Greening computed tomography: a position paper on environmentally responsible imaging practice from the computed tomography subspecialty section of the Italian society of radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Call to Action: A Sustainable Interventional Radiology Service.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- CIRSE Position Statement on Sustainability in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Invited Commentary on the CIRSE Position Statement on Sustainability in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Green radiology (part 1): environmental sustainability and energy consumption in medical imaging, with perspectives from Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Value-based approach to AVF maintenance: institutional micro-costing of drug-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty in a fixed-reimbursement system.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare waste accounts for a meaningful proportion of the global carbon footprint. There are innumerable global endeavours to integrate "green" initiatives into everyday living. Every interventional radiology (IR) department must strive to minimise its carbon footprint without any diminution of patient care. We explored the factors that negatively impact the environment with respect to waste generation in the IR suite and how simple innovations can bring about sustainable change. The aim of this review article is to outline the nature of waste generated in the IR suite and to describe changes that IR departments can make to reduce the negative environmental effect of their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.