Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40921684›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025

The effects of low-yield nicotine cigarette smoke inhalation on orthodontic tooth movement.

Burak Gulnar, Ahsen Gulnar, Alperen Kamiloglu, Peter Petocz, Ersan Karadeniz, Carmen Gonzales Karadeniz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Burak GulnarDepartment of Orthodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-763X
Ahsen GulnarDepartment of Prosthodontic, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-4351
Alperen KamilogluPrivate Practice, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5359-1379
Peter PetoczDepartment of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1266-0060
Ersan KaradenizPrivate Practice, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-0801
Carmen Gonzales KaradenizPrivate Practice, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0414-0663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of low-nicotine cigarette smoke (CS) inhalation on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in rats. Methods: Forty 4-week-old male Wistar rats, were randomly divided into four groups: three experimental and one control. Group 1 (control group) had dental impressions taken at week 9. Group 2: OTM group received a continuous mesially directed force applied to the maxillary first molar at week 9 for 4 weeks. Group 3: CS group rats had 9 weeks of CS inhalation; Group 4: CS + OTM group, 9 weeks of CS inhalation and 4 weeks of orthodontic force application. Rats in groups 3 (CS) and 4 (CS + OTM) were exposed to 10 cigarettes for 8 minutes, 3 times per day for 9 weeks. All groups had polyvinyl siloxane impressions taken at week 9 and at the end of the experimental period (week 13). At week 13, all rats were sacrificed under general anesthesia, and their maxillae were dissected and scanned using a TRIOS 2014-1 intraoral scanner. The tooth movements were measured using digital models. Results: A slight increase in tooth movement rate was observed in smokers. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: CS inhalation did not increase the rate of OTM in rats.

Indexed as

CigaretteRatsTooth movement

Identifiers

PMID40921684
PMCPMC12644640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.